 | Guest (Login) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
View Detailed Results or Weekly Recaps
|
TENTATIVE IMPORTANT DATES – KLFFE 2024
Wednesday February 21, 2024 - START TO LEAGUE YEAR 2024 TBD, 2024 - ACTIVE ROSTER EXPANDS TO 40 (3:00pm EST) TBD, 2024 - LEAGUE DUES MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO LEAGUE DRAFT TBD, 2024 - FINAL COMPENSATORY PICK DESIGNATIONS FOR 2024 TBD, 2024 - 13th ANNUAL PLAYER SELECTION MEETING (2024 Rookie Draft, 6 rounds) (12:00pm EST) TBD, 2024 - SPRING LEAGUE MEETING (League vote on Resolutions/Proposals) Friday August 23, 2024 - ACTIVE ROSTER CUTDOWN TO 30 (3:00pm EST) Friday August 30 2024 - ACTIVE ROSTER CUTDOWN TO 20 (3:00pm EST) Thursday September 5, 2024 - KICKOFF TO 2024 SEASON Sunday December 8, 2024 - 2024 SEASON TRADING DEADLINE (prior to 1pm Kickoffs Week 14) Thursday December 12-Monday December 16, 2024 - POSTSEASON QUARTER-FINALS (3rd seed v. 6th seed, 4th seed v. 5th seed) Thursday December 19-Monday December 25, 2024 - POSTSEASON SEMI-FINALS (1st seed v. TBD, 2nd seed v. TBD) Saturday December 29-Sunday December 30, 2024 - KING BOWL XIII (2024 KLFFE Championship Game) Wednesday January 1, 2025 - (Active Roster expands to 30; trading is open for all teams)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
           
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Constitution & Bylaws
1. Roster a. Active Roster b. Inactive Roster 1. Taxi Squad 2. Injured Reserve 2. Draft Lottery 3. League Dues 4. Payout Structure 5. Compensatory Draft Picks 6. Standings 7. Playoffs 8. Tanking
1. Roster a. Active Roster = 20 in-season; offseason varies b. Inactive Roster = 12 total (6 Taxi Squad + 6 IR) 1. Taxi Squad = 6 Any player with 3 or fewer years of NFL experience is eligible for deactivation to the Taxi Squad. Any Taxi Squad player can remain deactivated indefinitely, but once activated, he cannot be deactivated again for 56 days. 2. Injured Reserve = 6 Any player designated as Out, Injured, Injured Reserve or Suspended is eligible for deactivation to IR. A player who is away from the team due to a contract dispute or holdout is also eligible for Injured Reserve. These players are identified with an injury status of "H" A deactivated player must remain on the IR list for at least 28 days. The player can remain deactivated indefinitely, regardless of injury designation. (The following alert can be ignored: "Warning! Possible IR Rule Violation Above.")
2. Draft Lottery Each year, the 1.01 Rookie draft pick will be determined by randomly drawing from 75 lottery balls. Each Draft Lottery will be recorded on video and posted to the main page of KLFFE.com. The 75 Lottery balls will be dispersed as follows: Team | Odds% (ratio of Lottery balls; Lottery balls specified by number, between 1-75) 12th place | 44.0% (33/75; 1-33) 11th place | 30.7% (23/75; 34-56) 10th place | 20.0% (15/75; 57-71) 9th place | 5.3% (4/75; 72-75)
3. League Dues -Each Manager shall pay $150 per season to maintain his or her Franchise. -The League entry fee shall be due prior to the League's annual Rookie Draft, typically in May or June. At the discretion of the League Office, extenuating circumstances will allow for flexibility in paying the League entry fee. -Except for League Office approved extenuating circumstances, in the event any Manager fails to pay their League entry fee of $150 in full by the Kickoff of the first -NFL game, the following abilities will be locked: Submit lineups, Perform Add/Drops, Propose / accept trades, Make IR moves and Make Taxi Squad moves. -The League Office reserves the right to impose further penalties, at their discretion, such as but not limited to: Draft Pick forfeiture, Fines, League Expulsion, etc.
4. Payout Structure $1000 Champ | win Week 17 $300 Runner-up | lose Week 17 $150/each x 2 Semifinalist | lose Week 16 $200 Admin
The same payouts as seen in a stacking format: $700 Champ | win Week 17 $150/each x 2 Semifinalist | win Week 16 $150/each x 2 Semifinalist | win or bye in Week 15 $200 Admin Annual Administrative costs generally cover: $59 for myfantasyleague software, $25 for Fandraft software, $75-80 for the annual Championship trophy (ie, The Walt), KLFFE.com domain and email fees, any other costs associated with running the league such as paper, pens, mugs, etc. All receipts for official League purchases are kept in a file.
5. Compensatory Draft Picks a. Retired players. -A Aplayer is considered 'Retired' once he announces his intention to retire. It is not necessary for paperwork to be filed officiallywith the NFL. -A team is eligible for Draft Pick Compensation if the player was rostered throught the end of his Retirement Year (ie, last active NFL seaseon) and is not traded away or lost to Expansion. It is not necessary to continue rostering the player beyond the Retirement Year to receive Draft Pick Compensation. -The League Office will determine approximate Draft Pick Compensation based on criteria included below. If the Manager agrees to the retirement, the player will be removed from the roster and the Compensatory Draft Pick will be awarded for the next Draft (note: draft picks for future seasons cannot be added until that League year begins, but it is still considered awarded.). -If a retired player returns to active play, he may again be eligible for a Compensatory Draft Pick, however, no team may receive Compensation for the same player more than once. Criteria: 1. Vested Time* (the total consecutive years a player was rostered by said Franchise) 2. Positional Ranking (Cumulative + Pts/G grade)/2 per their position of two year’s prior) 3. Positional Ranking (Cumulative + Pts/G grade)/2 per their position of one year prior) 4. Positional Ranking (Cumulative + Pts/G grade)/2 per their position of Retirement Year) 5. Preseason ADP** (from August of either the Expansion or Retirement Year) 6. End of season ADP** (from November of either the Expansion or Retirement Year) 7. Age (at close of Retirement Year) b. Expansion. -Draft Pick Compensation will be awarded in the event of League Expansion. c. Discretionary. -Draft Pick Compensation may be awarded at the discretion of the League Office.
6. Standings Standings Sort Criteria #1: Overall Winning Percentage Standings Sort Criteria #2: Total Points Scored Standings Sort Criteria #3: Head-To-Head Record Standings Sort Criteria #4: Divisional Winning Percentage Standings Sort Criteria #5: All-Play Winning Percentage
7. Playoffs The Regular Season is 14 weeks and the number of Playoff teams is 6 (two Division Winners and 4 Wildcards). Playoff Seeding will be determined according to the following: Seed #1 | Division Winner with Best Overall Winning Percentage Seed #2 | Division Winner with 2nd Best Overall Winning Percentage Seed #3 | Overall Winning Percentage Seed #4 | Overall Winning Percentage Seed #5 | Overall Winning Percentage Seed #6 | Most Total Points Scored of remaining teams
Week 15 = Quarterfinals (Seed #3 vs. Seed #6; Seed #4 vs. Seed #5; Seed #s 1 & 2 [Division Winners] have a bye) Week 16 = Semifinals (Seed #s 1 & 2 each play the winner of the Week 15 Matchups; Seed #1 will play the lowest remaining seed and Seed #2 will play the highest remaining seed) Week 17 = King Bowl: League Championship Final (winners of Week 16 Matchup)
8. Tanking Strategic planning for the future is acceptable but 'tanking' will not be tolerated and will be determined by the following criteria: -League Managers must set the best possible starting lineup each week from the available pool of players, either from their Active Roster or from Waivers/Free Agency. (This can be somewhat subjective and if a Manager's decisions are questionable the League Office will determine if action is necessary) -League Managers are not required to activate players from Injured Reserve/Taxi Squad to add to their starting lineup unless no other options for a complete lineup are possible. Warnings will be given and addressed with the individual League Manager. The number of warnings is not static and will depend upon the degree to which Tanking has been determined to have taken place. If Tanking has been determined to have taken place and all warnings have been ignored, the League Office reserves the right to impose penalties, at their discretion, such as but not limited to: Draft Pick forfeiture, Fines, League Expulsion, etc. |
|
KLFFE RESOLUTIONS as of 4/5/2021
Resolution 0: Keepers in Year 1 Resolution 1: Buy-in Resolution 2: Transaction Fees Resolution 3: Divisions Resolution 4: Franchise Specific Names Resolution 5: 6th Keeper for Playoff Teams Resolution 6: Keeper Expansion for 2013 Resolution 7: Keeper Expansion for 2014 Resolution 8: League Expansion Resolution 9: Full Dynasty Resolution 10: Blind Bidding Waivers Resolution 11: Trading Deadline Resolution 12: Draft Lottery Resolution 13: Compensatory Draft Picks Resolution 14: Eliminating DSTs and Kickers Resolution 15: Points Per Reception Resolution 16: Inactive Roster Spots Resolution 17: Blind Bidding Dollars Resolution 18: Devy Players Resolution 19: Playoffs Resolution 20: Superflex
RESOLUTION 0: Keepers in Year 1 August 2, 2012 (Summer League Meeting) 0.) How many players should be kept following Year 1? A) 5 players should be kept 5 voted in favor --- PASSED B) 4 players should be kept. 1 voted in favor 4 abstained RESOLUTION 1: Buy-in May 13, 2013 (Spring League Meeting) 1.) Should the buy-in be raised from $100 to $120? Playoff participants not advancing to the Championship Game or finishing with the best overall regular season record were left out of our initial postseason purse. We now view this as an oversight. Additionally, the costs to successfully run the League have been made clear after one full year. $10/Manager of the proposed raised buy-in will be put toward admin. costs such as website maintenance, draft software & prep, trophy refurbishment and general time invested by League administration. The remaining buy-In will be put toward the other various proposed rewards to expand the payout structure as follows: $600 flat for the CHAMP, $250 flat for the RUNNER UP, $100 flat EACH for 3rd & 4th PLACE (i.e., playoff participants that do not advance), and a $50 BONUS FOR REGULAR SEASON TITLE (which will be added to any other flat postseason reward). 9 voted in favor — PASSED 1 abstained
June 10, 2014 (Spring League Meeting) 1.1a) Should the buy-in be raised from $120? If “Yes”, to $125 or $130? This additional monies collected (either $50 or $100) will be allocated to the winner of King Bowl III. A) Yes, I want to increase the buy-in. 6 voted in favor --- PASSED B) No, I do not want to increase the buy-in. 4 opposed
1.1b) If Yes, the buy-in should be increased to: A) $125 3 voted in favor --- PASSED B) $130 3 voted in favor
March 9, 2017 (Winter League Meeting) 1.2) Should the buy-in be raised from $125 to $130? The additional monies collected will be allocated to postseason semifinalists. A) Yes, I want to increase the buy-in. 9 voted in favor --- PASSED B) No, I do not want to increase the buy-in.
1 abstained
May 10, 2018 (Spring League Meeting) 1.3a) Should the buy-in be raised from $130? The additional monies collected will be allocated to postseason semifinalists. A.) Yes, I want to increase the buy-in. 7 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, I do not want to increase the buy-in. 2 opposed
1.3b) If Yes, what should the new buy-in be? A) $150 8 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) $175 C) $200 1 voted in favor
Tentative Payout Structure (we can vote on this as well)
1.4a) Should the buy-in be raised from $150? The additional monies collected will be allocated to postseason finalists. A.) Yes, I want to increase the buy-in. 3 voted in favor B) No, I do not want to increase the buy-in. 7 opposed --- FAILED
1.4b) If Yes, what should the new buy-in be? A) $175 4 voted in favor B) $200 1 voted in favor 7 abstained RESOLUTION 2: Transaction Fees May 13, 2013 (Spring League Meeting) 2.) Should transaction fee structure be adjusted? The proposed adjustment to the transaction fee structure is as follows: the first 15 transactions are FREE. Each successive transaction costs $1/each, payable upon season’s end. The collected funds will be split between any outstanding admin. overages or will be saved for future use, i.e. draft/postseason banquet. (FYI: offseason transactions do not count toward transaction limits and are not taxable). 9 voted in favor — PASSED — future vote will take place on nature of fees 1 abstained
June 10, 2014 (Spring League Meeting) 2.1) Should transaction fee structure be adjusted? A) Yes, individual transaction fees should be increased from $1 to $1.25 4 voted in favor B) No, individual transaction fees should remain $1. 6 opposed ---- FAILED RESOLUTION 3: Divisions May 13, 2013 (Spring League Meeting) 3.) Should the League be split into two 5-team Divisions? Each of the 5 teams play their respective division opponents twice, totaling 8 games. The remaining 6 games will be played against teams from the other division— 1 game each for 4 teams, and 2 games against the 5th. The top 2 teams in each division will advance to the playoffs and play one another in the 1st round— a “Division Championship Game”. The winner of each Division Championship Game will then square off in King Bowl II. The purpose is to add intrigue and drama to the regular season as well as foster more competitive division rivalries across several years. Second part— What are the tie breakers for Division Standings: points system or Division & head to head records? 3 voted in favor 6 opposed ---- FAILED RESOLUTION 4: Franchise Specific Names May 13, 2013 (Spring League Meeting) 4.) Should the League enforce franchise specific names? The proposed plan is for “permanent” team names in the traditional fashion: CITY + MASCOT. Examples of this type from this past season include the Cleveland Coyotes & NY G-Man. This issue has been proposed in the interest of limiting confusion and streamlining our League’s identity. Unofficial tally: 7 votes in favor, 2 opposed on modified proposal— will revote at a later date
August 17, 2013 (2nd Annual Draft) 4.1a) Should the League enforce permanent franchise specific names? (This issue has been proposed in the interest of limiting confusion and streamlining our League’s identity.) 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED 1 opposed
4.1b) If yes, should the names be restricted to the formula of "CITY + MASCOT" (ie, Cleveland Coyotes) or no restriction? 6 vote in favor ---- PASSED 4 opposed *Note that by "CITY" it is not required to be an actual city: Any homebase location would be acceptable such as a nation, planet, fictional locale (Tatooine, Mordor, etc) or even a descriptor like Sielschott Manor, etc. RESOLUTION 5: 6th Keeper for Playoff Teams May 13, 2013 (Spring League Meeting) 5.) Should playoff teams be awarded a 6th Keeper? Keeping in mind that qualifying for the postseason in year 1 did not guarantee a share in the playoff purse and we are proposing a system change, should playoff teams be allowed to hold a 6th Keeper? The purpose would be to reward more shrewd Managers for assembling better rosters in the same way that better draft position assists Managers with poor records. Incentive for striving for the postseason would be increased. 1 voted in favor 8 opposed ---- FAILED RESOLUTION 6: Keeper Expansion for 2013 May 13, 2013 (Spring League Meeting) 6.) Should Keeper list be expanded from 5 to 6 for all teams? * The current Keeper limit for our League is 5 roster players for each franchise. Typically, Keeper Leagues are either Dynasty format— where complete rosters including developmental taxi squads are kept from season to season— or the limit on the low end of the spectrum is 6 roster players decided at a given time much like our League. 1 voted in favor 6 opposed ---- FAILED 2 abstained RESOLUTION 7: Keeper Expansion for 2014 August 24, 2013 (2nd Annual Draft) 7a.) Should the Keeper limit be increased from 5 for the 2014 Season? 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED 1 opposed
7b.) If so, should the increase be to 6 or 7? 7 voted in favor of 6 keepers ---- PASSED 3 voted in favor of 7 keepers It has been our contention from the start that we would gradually increase the number of Keepers from year to year until we either reached a full-on Dynasty format or a number with which we were all comfortable. We will likely vote each year to increase the Keeper limit, the proposed numbers being based upon discussion throughout the year.
June 10, 2014 (Spring League Meeting) 7.1) a. Should the Keeper limit be increased from 6 for the 2015 Season? A) Yes, the Keeper limit should be increased from 6. 10 voted in favor ---- PASSED unanimously B) No, the Keeper limit should remain at 6.
7.1) b. If so, should the increase be to 7, 8 or 9? (vote for b. even if you voted “No” for a. --- a plurality of 4 or more will determine the final choice) A) The Keeper limit should be increased to 7. 4 voted in favor B) The Keeper limit should be increased to 8. 6 voted in favor ---- PASSED C) The Keeper limit should be increased to 9. RESOLUTION 8: League Expansion June 10, 2014 (Spring League Meeting) 8.) Should the King’s League expand from 10 to 12 teams in Year 2015? A) Yes, the King's League should expand from 10 to 12 teams in Year 2015. 4 voted in favor B) No, the King's League should not yet expand. 5 opposed — FAILED 1 abstained
March 10, 2016 (Winter League Meeting) 8.1) Should the King’s League expand from 10 to 12 teams in Year 2017? A) Yes, the King's League should expand from 10 to 12 teams in Year 2017. 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, the King's League should not yet expand. 1 opposed RESOLUTION 9: Full Dynasty June 10, 2014 (Spring League Meeting) 9a) Should the King’s League to Full Dynasty in Year 2015? For this measure to pass, the vote must be unanimous with no abstaining votes allowed. A) Yes, the King's League should move to Full Dynasty beginning with Year 2015. 2 voted in favor B) No, the King's League should not yet move to Full Dynasty. 8 opposed ---- FAILED
9b) If the King’s League does not move to Full Dynasty in Year 2015, is interest sufficient enough to revisit and further flesh out the concept? A) Yes, we should revisit the Full Dynasty discussion at a later date. 7 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, the King's League should never move to Full Dynasty. 2 opposed 1 abstained NOTE: If Resolution 9a. passes it will supersede Resolution 7.1.
June 11, 2015 (Spring League Meeting) 9.1a) Should the King’s League to Full Dynasty in Year 2016? A) Yes, the King's League should move to Full Dynasty beginning with Year 2016. 10 voted in favor ---- PASSED unanimously B) No, the King's League should not yet move to Full Dynasty.
9.1b) If the King’s League does not move to Full Dynasty in Year 2016, is interest sufficient enough to revisit and further flesh out the concept? RESOLUTION 10: Blind Bidding Waivers June 11, 2015 (Spring League Meeting) 10) Blind Bidding Waivers A) Yes, we should adopt Blind Bidding as the Waiver system. 10 voted in favor ---- PASSED unanimously B) No, we should not adopt Blind Bidding as the Waiver system. RESOLUTION 11: Trading Deadline June 11, 2015 (Spring League Meeting) 11) Trading Deadline A) Yes, it should be moved up earlier than Week 14. 4 voted in favor B) No, it should remain Week 14. 6 opposed ---- FAILED
11b) If yes, to Week 12 or Week 13?
May 10, 2018 (Spring League Meeting) 11.1a) Should the Trading Deadline be moved up from Week 14 (Sunday 1pm)? A) Yes, it should be moved up earlier than Week 14 (Sunday 1pm). 2 voted in favor B) No, it should remain Week 14 (Sunday 1pm). 7 opposed ---- FAILED 1 abstained
11.1b) If yes, to Week 12 or Week 13? A) Week 12, Thursday 8pm B) Week 12, Sunday 1pm C) Week 13, Thursday 8pm 1 voted in favor D) Week 13, Sunday 1pm E) Week 14, Thursday 8pm 7 voted in favor 2 abstained
March 29, 2019 (Spring League Meeting) 11.2a) Should the Trading Deadline be moved up from Week 13 (Sunday 1pm)? A) Yes, it should be moved up earlier than Week 13 (Sunday 1pm). 3 voted in favor B) No, it should remain Week 13 (Sunday 1pm). 7 opposed ---- FAILED
11.2b) If yes, to Week 11 or Week 12? A) Week 11, Thursday 8pm B) Week 11, Sunday 1pm C) Week 12, Thursday 8pm 1 voted in favor D) Week 12, Sunday 1pm E) Week 13, Thursday 8pm 4 voted in favor 7 abstained
RESOLUTION 12: Draft Lottery June 11, 2015 (Spring League Meeting) 12) Should we institute a Draft Lottery for 1st round picks 1-3 for 2016? The proposed draft lottery is a random drawing for teams finishing 8th, 9th and 10th. The lottery format and/or odds are open for debate. The odds for each team of the original proposal are as follows: A) Yes, we should institute a Draft Lottery. 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not institute a Draft Lottery. 1 opposed RESOLUTION 13: Compensatory Draft Picks June 11, 2015 (Spring League Meeting) 13) Should we institute compensatory picks for retired players? (Non-binding exploratory vote) A) Yes, we should institute compensatory picks for retired players. 6 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not institute compensatory picks for retired players. 4 opposed
March 10, 2016 (Winter League Meeting) 13.1) Should we institute compensatory picks for retired players? A) Yes, we should institute compensatory picks for retired players. 6 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not institute compensatory picks for retired players. 4 opposed RESOLUTION 14: Eliminating DSTs and Kickers June 11, 2015 (Spring League Meeting) 14.) Should we eliminate DSTs and Kickers for the 2015 season? The Active roster size will remain at 18 and a 2nd FLEX (RB/WR/TE) will be added to the starting lineup (This issue is in response to the recent changes to the NFL’s Extra Point rules) A) Yes, we should eliminate DSTs and Kickers for the 2015 season. 5 voted in favor B) No, we should not eliminate DSTs and Kickers for the 2015 season. 5 opposed ---- FAILED
March 10, 2016 (Winter League Meeting) 14.1) Should we eliminate DSTs and Kickers for the 2016 season? The Active roster size will remain at 16 with 3 IR spots and 3 Taxi Squad spots. Additionally, a 2nd FLEX (RB/WR/TE) will be added to the starting lineup. The 2015 vote on this issue was split 5-5.
14.1a) Should we eliminate DSTs for the 2016 season? A) Yes, we should eliminate DSTs for the 2016 season. 5 voted in favor B) No, we should not eliminate DSTs for the 2016 season. 5 opposed ---- FAILED
14.1b) Should we eliminate Kickers for the 2016 season? A) Yes, we should eliminate Kickers for the 2016 season. 7 voted in favor --- PASSED B) No, we should not eliminate Kickers for the 2016 season. 3 opposed
March 9, 2017 (Winter League Meeting) 14.2) Should we eliminate DSTS beginning with the 2017 season? The Active roster size will be reduced to 19 and both Taxi Squad and Injured Reserve will increase by 1 each. A 3rd WR will be added to the starting lineup.
A) Yes, we should eliminate DSTs beginning with the 2017 season. 6 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not eliminate DSTs beginning with the 2017 season. 3 opposed 1 abstained
Active Roster: 18 Taxi Squad: 4 Injured Reserve: 4
Starting Lineup: QB RB RB WR WR WR TE FLEX (Rb, WR or TE) FLEX (Rb, WR or TE)
May 2, 2017, Emergency vote 14.3) Should we increase the Active Roster size from 19 to 20 spots? A) Yes, we should increase the Active Roster from 19 to 20. 10 voted in favor ---- PASSED UNANIMOUSLY B) No, we should not increase the Active Roster from 19 to 20.
May 10, 2018 (Spring League Meeting) 14.4) Should we increase the Active Roster size from 20 spots? A) Yes, we should increase the Active Roster from 20. 4 voted in favor B) No, we should not increase the Active Roster from 20. 5 opposed ---- FAILED 1 abstained
April 2, 2019 (Spring League Meeting) 14.5) Should we increase the Active Roster size from 20 spots? A) Yes, we should increase the Active Roster from 20. 4 voted in favor B) No, we should not increase the Active Roster from 20. 5 opposed ---- FAILED 1 abstained
March 29, 2021 (Spring League Meeting) Starting Lineup will remain 9 total players but positional restrictions will be loosened to increase flexibility: 14.6a) Should we change the Starting Lineup? A) Yes, we should change the Starting Lineup. 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not increase the Active Roster from 20. 3 opposed
14.6b) If yes, the Starting Lineup will depend on the results of Resolution 14.5b): A) Only 1 required WR. QB RB WR TE FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) 1 voted in favor B) Two required WRs. QB RB WR WR TE FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) 11 voted in favor ---- PASSED
14.6c) If Yes, in 2021 or 2022? A) 2021. 6 voted in favor B) 2022. 6 voted in favor RESOLUTION 15: Points Per Reception March 10, 2016 (Winter League Meeting) 15a.) Should we move to PPR scoring for the 2017 season? A) Yes, we should move to PPR scoring for the 2017 season. 7 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not. 3 opposed
15b.) If yes, should we move to full PPR or half PPR? A) Full PPR (one full Point Per Reception). B) Half PPR (one half (0.5) Point Per Reception). 4 voted in favor ---- PASSED C) Quarter PPR (one quarter (0.25) Point Per Reception). 3 voted in favor 3 abstained
March 9, 2017 (Winter League Meeting) 15.1) Should we move to full PPR scoring for the 2018 season? (delayed vote) A) Yes, we should move to full PPR scoring for the 2018 season. B) No, we should not move to full PPR scoring for the 2018 season.
May 10, 2018 (Spring League Meeting) 15.1) Should we move to full PPR scoring for the 2018 season? A) Yes, we should move to full PPR scoring for the 2018 season. 4 voted in favor B) No, we should not move to full PPR scoring for the 2018 season. 5 opposed ---- FAILED 1 abstained
March 29, 2019 (Spring League Meeting) 15.2) Should we move to full PPR scoring for the 2019 season? A) Yes, we should move to full PPR scoring for the 2019 season. 3 voted in favor B) No, we should not move to full PPR scoring for the 2019 season. 7 opposed ---- FAILED 2 abstained RESOLUTION 16: Inactive Roster Spots March 9, 2017 (Winter League Meeting) 16a) Should we increase the number of Inactive Roster spots? A) Yes, we should increase the number of Inactive Roster spots. 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not increase the number of Inactive Roster spots.
1 abstained
16b) If Yes, then how many Inactive Roster spots should be added? A) Injured Reserve and Taxi Squad Roster Spots should be increased by 1 each. 7 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) Injured Reserve should be increased by 2 Roster Spots. C) Taxi Squad should be increased by 2 Roster Spots. 2 voted in favor 1 abstained
March 29, 2019 (Spring League Meeting) 16.1a) Should we increase the number of Inactive Roster spots? A) Yes, we should increase the number of Inactive Roster spots. 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not increase the number of Inactive Roster spots. 1 opposed
16.1b) If Yes, then how many Inactive Roster spots should be added? A) Injured Reserve and Taxi Squad Roster Spots should be increased by 1 each. 8 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) Injured Reserve should be increased by 2 Roster Spots. C) Taxi Squad should be increased by 2 Roster Spots. 1 voted in favor
May 28, 2020 (Spring League Meeting) 16.2a) Should we increase the number of Inactive Roster spots? A) Yes, we should increase the number of Inactive Roster spots. 2 voted in favor B) No, we should not increase the number of Inactive Roster spots. 10 opposed ---- FAILED
16.2b) If Yes, then how many Inactive Roster spots should be added? A) Injured Reserve and Taxi Squad Roster Spots should be increased by 1 each. 10 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) Injured Reserve should be increased by 2 Roster Spots. 1 voted in favor C) Taxi Squad should be increased by 2 Roster Spots. 1 voted in favor RESOLUTION 17: Blind Bidding Dollars March 9, 2017 (Winter League Meeting) 17a) Should we rollover remaining Blind Bidding dollars to the next season (beginning after 2017)? A) Yes, we should rollover remaining Blind Bidding dollars to the next season. 8 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) No, we should not rollover Blind Bidding dollars to the next season. 1 opposed 1 abstained
17b) If Yes, what percent of total remaining Blind Bidding dollars should be rolled over? A) 100% of remaining Blind Bidding dollars should be rolled over. 5 voted in favor ---- PASSED B) 50% of remaining Blind Bidding dollars should be rolled over. 2 voted in favor C) 20% of remaining Blind Bidding dollars should be rolled over. 2 voted in favor 1 abstained
March 29, 2019 (Spring League Meeting) 17.1a) Should we continue to rollover remaining Blind Bidding dollars to the next season (beginning after 2019)? A) Yes, we should continue to rollover remaining Blind Bidding dollars to the next season. 6 voted in favor ---- split decision, no change B) No, we should not continue to rollover Blind Bidding dollars to the next season. 6 opposed
17.1b) If Yes, what percent of total remaining Blind Bidding dollars should be rolled over? Most likely 25% rollover with a $250 cap RESOLUTION 18: Devy Players May 10, 2018 (Spring League Meeting) 18) Should we allow devy picks in 2019? A) Yes, we should allow devy picks in 2019. 4 voted in favor B) No, we should not allow devy picks in 2019. 7 opposed ---- FAILED 1 abstained
-College/High School players eligible in our rookie draft -Restricted to only 1 pick per team per draft year (no more than 10 devy picks per draft year) -Devy players can be traded -any team can hold as many devy players as they wish -Devy players will be Taxi Squad eligible -Devy players can held indefinitely, but once dropped, they cannot be added via Free Agency or Waivers. -Dropped devy players will re-renter the draft for the next season. RESOLUTION 19: Playoffs February XX, 2019 (Winter League Meeting) (Will reword this part more clearly later)
19a.) Should we change the Postseason format to an All-Play tournament? A) Yes, we should change the Postseason format to an All-Play tournament. 5 voted in favor B) No, we should not change the Postseason format to an All-Play tournament. 7 opposed ---- FAILED 19b.) If Yes, in 2020 or 2021? A) 2020. 3 voted in favor B) 2021. 9 voted in favor ---- PASSED
RESOLUTION 20: Superflex March 29, 2021 (Spring League Meeting) In the event Resolution 20 passes we will hold a special QB only draft similar to our Expansion Draft two years ago. Each of the 12 teams will be allowed to protect up to 2 rostered QBs, the rest will join QBs on the Waiver Wire as part of the draft. The draft will be 2 rounds and the order will match the Rookie Draft order (reverse 2020 standings). This QB only draft will be held prior to the 2021 Rookie Draft: 20a.) Should we replace one of the FLEX spots in the Starting Lineup with a SUPERFLEX option (ie, QB)? A) Yes, we should move to Superflex. 4 voted in favor B) No, we should not move to Superflex. 8 opposed ---- FAILED
If yes, the Starting Lineup will depend on the results of Resolution 14.5b): A) Only 1 required WR. QB RB WR TE FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) SUPERFLEX (QB, RB, WR or TE)
B) Two required WRs. QB RB WR WR TE FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) FLEX (RB, WR or TE) SUPERFLEX (QB, RB, WR or TE)
A) 2021. 2 voted in favor B) 2022. 10 voted in favor ---- PASSED
|
|
ALL-TIME MANAGER RECORDS
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
King's League 2020 All-Pro Team
King's League 2019 All-Pro Team
King's League 2018 All-Pro Team
King's League 2017 All-Pro Team
King's League 2016 All-Pro Team
King's League 2015 All-Pro Team
King's League 2014 All-Pro Team
King's League 2013 All-Pro Team
King's League 2012 All-Pro Team
|
King's League Most Valuable Player 2012-2020
King's League Rookie of the Year 2012-2020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
KING BOWL HALL OF CHAMPIONS
|
|
|
